AIO score
Strong82
out of 100
11x.ai
Last audited: May 3, 2026
AIO score
Strong82
out of 100
Hallucinations detected
None detected0 / 1
No sampled questions flagged
Audit Result: 11x.ai has low observed hallucination risk in this Ghost Q&A sample (Score: 0/1) due to non-compliant LLM crawlability — weakest pillar in this run was Renderability & JS (6/100).
Diagnostic summary. Our audit detected that 11x is comparatively weakest in renderability & JavaScript (6/100); therefore, the raw HTML may not reliably surface everything LLM crawlers need to quote your brand accurately.
Reference: https://11x.ai/
Page: https://11x.ai/
What is this, and how does it make my life better?
OKRed panel: first automated snapshot. Green panel: what visitors see on the hydrated page — automation should match this.
01 This is a service offered by 11x that provides digital AI workers designed to transform revenue teams by executing, learning, and optimizing across all customer touchpoints. It makes your life better by automating tasks, enhancing productivity, and allowing your team to focus on higher impact work. The digital workers, such as Alice (an AI Sales Development Representative) and Julian (an AI Phone Agent), help engage prospects, drive qualified meetings, and improve customer relationships, ultimately leading to increased efficiency and revenue generation.
01 This is a platform that provides digital workers, specifically AI-driven tools like Alice the SDR and Julian the Phone Agent, designed to automate and enhance sales and customer engagement processes. It makes your life better by increasing operational efficiency, boosting revenue growth, decreasing costs per lead, and improving lead qualification, allowing your team to focus on higher-impact work while the digital workers handle routine tasks.
Executive summary
Category breakdown
Coverage: complete · Certainty: high
No peer domains were associated with this audit.
The Ghost test is a short Q&A pass on pages we sample. We ask ChatGPT the same question twice: once using the page's raw HTML (what you get from a simple fetch, before JavaScript runs—like a basic crawler), and once using the visible text after the page's JavaScript has run (what we capture with a real browser). If the raw-HTML pass can barely answer or says the information isn't there, but the fully rendered pass can answer in a clearer, fuller way, we flag hallucination risk—because an AI that only saw the static HTML could answer very differently from one that sees the page the way a visitor does.
The AIO score combines four pillar scores—how discoverable the site is, how reliably content shows up for automation, how clear the layout and wording are, and how well titles and previews match the page. The total is shown as a single 0–100 number so you can compare runs over time.
Confidence reflects how complete and consistent the evidence was in this audit. Higher confidence means we had enough stable signal to treat the results as a stronger guide; lower confidence means you should treat it as directional and validate anything critical.
Structure is about organization and readability. Hallucination flags compare whether answers match across different ways automation reads the same page. A site can look well organized yet still show different facts in different readings, which is how inconsistent AI answers slip through.