AIO score
Needs work49
out of 100
alphaspread.com
Last audited: May 3, 2026
AIO score
Needs work49
out of 100
Hallucinations detected
None detected0 / 1
No sampled questions flagged
Audit Result: alphaspread.com has low observed hallucination risk in this Ghost Q&A sample (Score: 0/1) due to non-compliant LLM crawlability — weakest pillar in this run was Technical & crawlability (0/100).
Diagnostic summary. Our audit detected that alphaspread is comparatively weakest in technical & crawlability (0/100); therefore, the raw HTML may not reliably surface everything LLM crawlers need to quote your brand accurately.
Reference: https://alphaspread.com/
Page: https://alphaspread.com/
What is this, and how does it make my life better?
OKRed panel: first automated snapshot. Green panel: what visitors see on the hydrated page — automation should match this.
01 Alpha Spread is a powerful stock valuation platform that offers automatic intrinsic valuation, Wall Street estimates, and comprehensive fundamental analysis. It enhances your investment decisions by allowing you to stress-test valuations under different market scenarios, compare current valuations to historical averages, and receive notifications when stock prices reach intrinsic values. The platform also includes tools like a stock screener, DCF calculator, and AI assistant for smarter investment strategies. Overall, it helps you identify undervalued stocks, potentially leading to better investment returns.
01 This is a stock valuation tool called Alpha Spread that helps investors determine the intrinsic value of stocks. It makes your life better by providing trusted valuation estimates, allowing you to make informed investment decisions, stress-test valuations, receive notifications for price changes, and access various tools for stock analysis. It aims to help you identify undervalued stocks that can potentially yield better returns.
Executive summary
Category breakdown
Coverage: partial · Certainty: medium
The Ghost test is a short Q&A pass on pages we sample. We ask ChatGPT the same question twice: once using the page's raw HTML (what you get from a simple fetch, before JavaScript runs—like a basic crawler), and once using the visible text after the page's JavaScript has run (what we capture with a real browser). If the raw-HTML pass can barely answer or says the information isn't there, but the fully rendered pass can answer in a clearer, fuller way, we flag hallucination risk—because an AI that only saw the static HTML could answer very differently from one that sees the page the way a visitor does.
The AIO score combines four pillar scores—how discoverable the site is, how reliably content shows up for automation, how clear the layout and wording are, and how well titles and previews match the page. The total is shown as a single 0–100 number so you can compare runs over time.
Confidence reflects how complete and consistent the evidence was in this audit. Higher confidence means we had enough stable signal to treat the results as a stronger guide; lower confidence means you should treat it as directional and validate anything critical.
Structure is about organization and readability. Hallucination flags compare whether answers match across different ways automation reads the same page. A site can look well organized yet still show different facts in different readings, which is how inconsistent AI answers slip through.