AIO score
Strong76
out of 100
sdk.finance
Last audited: May 3, 2026
AIO score
Strong76
out of 100
Hallucinations detected
Detected1 / 4
One or more questions flagged
Audit Result: sdk.finance has measurable AI hallucination risk (Score: 1/4) due to non-compliant LLM crawlability — weakest pillar in this run was Renderability & JS (6/100).
Diagnostic summary. Our audit detected that sdk relies heavily on JavaScript-dependent rendering and hydration; therefore, the raw HTML often does not contain the same relevant information humans see after the page finishes loading.
Pages sampled for Ghost Q&A (one per question)
Coverage: partial · Certainty: high
Page: https://sdk.finance/pricing
What is the pricing?
FlaggedRed panel: first automated snapshot. Green panel: what visitors see on the hydrated page — automation should match this.
01 not found
01 The pricing options for SDK.finance are as follows:
02
03 1. **Annual Licensing**:
04 - Optimize CAPEX
05 - Predictable annual expenses
06 - Lower initial capital expenditure
07 - Best for enterprises seeking to conserve capital
08
09 2. **Lifetime Licensing**:
10 - Maximize long-term value
11 - Single one-time investment
12 - No recurring fees, reducing OPEX
13 - Ideal for organizations prioritizing long-term value with minimal impact on future budgets
14
15 For specific pricing details, it is suggested to request a quote.
All sampled questions
Executive summary
Category breakdown
Coverage: partial · Certainty: high
No peer domains were associated with this audit.
The Ghost test is a short Q&A pass on pages we sample. We ask ChatGPT the same question twice: once using the page's raw HTML (what you get from a simple fetch, before JavaScript runs—like a basic crawler), and once using the visible text after the page's JavaScript has run (what we capture with a real browser). If the raw-HTML pass can barely answer or says the information isn't there, but the fully rendered pass can answer in a clearer, fuller way, we flag hallucination risk—because an AI that only saw the static HTML could answer very differently from one that sees the page the way a visitor does.
The AIO score combines four pillar scores—how discoverable the site is, how reliably content shows up for automation, how clear the layout and wording are, and how well titles and previews match the page. The total is shown as a single 0–100 number so you can compare runs over time.
Confidence reflects how complete and consistent the evidence was in this audit. Higher confidence means we had enough stable signal to treat the results as a stronger guide; lower confidence means you should treat it as directional and validate anything critical.
Structure is about organization and readability. Hallucination flags compare whether answers match across different ways automation reads the same page. A site can look well organized yet still show different facts in different readings, which is how inconsistent AI answers slip through.