AIO score
Strong75
out of 100
userpilot.com
Last audited: May 3, 2026
AIO score
Strong75
out of 100
Hallucinations detected
None detected0 / 4
No sampled questions flagged
Audit Result: userpilot.com has low observed hallucination risk in this Ghost Q&A sample (Score: 0/4) due to non-compliant LLM crawlability — weakest pillar in this run was Renderability & JS (7/100).
Diagnostic summary. Our audit detected that userpilot is comparatively weakest in renderability & JavaScript (7/100); therefore, the raw HTML may not reliably surface everything LLM crawlers need to quote your brand accurately.
Pages sampled for Ghost Q&A (one per question)
Coverage: partial · Certainty: high
Page: https://userpilot.com/pricing
What is the pricing?
OKRed panel: first automated snapshot. Green panel: what visitors see on the hydrated page — automation should match this.
01 Pricing for Userpilot includes:
02
03 1. **Starter Plan**:
04 - From $299/month (paid annually)
05 - Up to 2,000 Monthly Active Users
06 - Features include In-App User Engagement, User Segmentation & Tracking, Analyze Usage Trends, and NPS Survey.
07
08 2. **Growth Plan**:
09 - Starts from 5,000 Monthly Active Users
10 - Includes everything from the Starter plan plus Advanced Product Analytics, Event Autocapture, Resource Center & Advanced In-App Surveys, Email Engagement, and Unlimited Session Replays (Add-On).
11
12 3. **Enterprise Plan**:
13 - Custom solutions for large teams
14 - Includes everything from the Growth plan plus Premium Integrations, Bulk Data Export & Import, Data Warehouse Sync, Custom Roles & Permissions, SAML SSO & Activity Logs, Security Audit & Compliance, and Custom Contract & SLA.
15
16 For more details, you can book a demo or talk to Userpilot for a custom solution.
01 STARTER: From $299/mo paid annually
02 GROWTH: Let’s Talk
03 ENTERPRISE: Let’s Talk
All sampled questions
Executive summary
Category breakdown
Coverage: partial · Certainty: high
The Ghost test is a short Q&A pass on pages we sample. We ask ChatGPT the same question twice: once using the page's raw HTML (what you get from a simple fetch, before JavaScript runs—like a basic crawler), and once using the visible text after the page's JavaScript has run (what we capture with a real browser). If the raw-HTML pass can barely answer or says the information isn't there, but the fully rendered pass can answer in a clearer, fuller way, we flag hallucination risk—because an AI that only saw the static HTML could answer very differently from one that sees the page the way a visitor does.
The AIO score combines four pillar scores—how discoverable the site is, how reliably content shows up for automation, how clear the layout and wording are, and how well titles and previews match the page. The total is shown as a single 0–100 number so you can compare runs over time.
Confidence reflects how complete and consistent the evidence was in this audit. Higher confidence means we had enough stable signal to treat the results as a stronger guide; lower confidence means you should treat it as directional and validate anything critical.
Structure is about organization and readability. Hallucination flags compare whether answers match across different ways automation reads the same page. A site can look well organized yet still show different facts in different readings, which is how inconsistent AI answers slip through.